Comments on: Indian Army looses battle against Arjun Tank, but, will there be Arjun Mark-2?

By: Porki

Porki — Sun, 27 Feb 2011 08:19:46 +0000

Nouman you are an inbred pakistani

Go back to pakistan and roll in your pigsty porki

By: akashveer

akashveer — Sat, 26 Feb 2011 11:05:51 +0000

Nouman I think you have forgotten who is you father and first check your data about PAF and IAF in 1965 n 1971

By: KHAN MOHAMMAD.

KHAN MOHAMMAD. — Sun, 31 Oct 2010 23:17:09 +0000

Its really sad we Indians dont have faith in our home made products…have we forgotten Gandhi..?Khadi although not good looking but was more comfortable then the synthetic cloths..for this we have to wear the khadi atleast once to know the benefits of it…likewise lets use our Arjun then i m sure we can outgun any of the tank made outside…we should have faith in Arjun….

By: nouman

nouman — Mon, 05 Jul 2010 15:09:17 +0000

you bastard indian always thing that you are superior to every one any country specially pakistan but true fact is your people and your army is coward useless you cannot compared your army with pakistan even with chinese army batain sub kar latey agar tum pigs ko yah yaqeen nahi hota k pak army best army hai in the world tou hamein sabit karnay ki zarorat nahi hai humarey log tum pigs say better hain 1965 ki war mein pak air force ne indian air force kay 104 crafts destroy kar diyah thay tum log sirf batoon ka sher ho idiots,bastards,etc…

By: Arjun MBT to take on T-90 - Page 20 - Pakistan Defence Forum

Arjun MBT to take on T-90 - Page 20 - Pakistan Defence Forum — Wed, 20 Jan 2010 09:34:08 +0000

[...] Not Ranked : +0 / -0 0 score Re: Arjun MBT to take on T-90 This article is from Feb 2009 , can anyone please calrify if the Arjun is being scrapped from further research and production. I actually though South Asia may be the new defence equipment manufacturer, regardless of whether Indian, Pakistani and I suppose China will fall into the Asia part. ——— Indian Army looses battle against Arjun Tank, but, will there be Arjun Mark-2? | Frontier India Stra… [...]

By: Prasad

Prasad — Sun, 29 Mar 2009 13:10:47 +0000

Dear Hindustani if the German Leopard II A6 is a top MBT and much better than the T90. Than the Arjun must be a verry good tank because it’s almost a copy of this tank. It maby also better because DRDO has proven the elektornics, computers and transnission part. I would challenge anny Fucking indian general in his T90 in a Arjun tank. I would also take it whit the Arjun mk II against the Abraham.
Arjun is a hunter killer MBT like western tanks

By: das

das — Sat, 21 Feb 2009 01:17:49 +0000

Tehelka shows that whole India civil service, defence staff and political setup is rotten.
Is it then surprising that this sort of patent bias for foreign weapons, which provide ample opportunity for foreign tours, five star hotels and kickbacks, is being displayed so nakedly? These rotters should be court marshalled and kicked from the army.

By: Harinayan D

Harinayan D — Sat, 21 Feb 2009 01:12:38 +0000

Indian army is reflection of Indian society, corrupt to the core, and gives a toss about India and instead generals want hefty kickbacks. The disagreement itself suggests that the army officials are biased and splitting hair. They could learn from Russian, who fought with their own poor euipment and improved it over time rather than burdening their nation by hefty overseas buys. When you buy weapons from others you not only pay but also become their hostage, nay slave.

By: some one

some one — Thu, 12 Feb 2009 12:09:06 +0000

One reason is that an Indian always thinks himself too superior to talk to fellow Indians, but the White Man is better than any Indian.

Secondly we are habituated to avoiding rather than facing truth. In reasearch and development we have to face a thousand failures before we find a single success, which is very difficult for us. Indians are always eager to announce success as if their very life depended on it, rather wait for time to prove it.

By: some one

some one — Thu, 12 Feb 2009 12:04:16 +0000

Even if there are shortcomings, the cause should be found and reasons why it cannot be overcome identified.

It is unscientific for the Army to act as a mere final user who is not to bother with the past or future. Self reliance cannot be acheived without participation of Users in the overall research and development process.

Scientists too are to blame because they have fostered the attitude that reasearch is the sole prerogative of theirs and no one else should have anything to do with it.

This kind of Compartmented thinking is the enemy of progress of knowledge.